Status

Status
Inactive

Your details

E-mail:

Update your details || || Logout

Navigation


Interviews


Tom Hiscocks – Creator of the Queen’s Beasts

— October 2012

Associated media

The Unicorn of Scotland - one of the Queen's Beasts by Tom Hiscocks. Photograph Greg Hider

Intrigued by his sculptures of the Queen’s Beasts, Frances Follin asked Tom Hiscocks about his work.

In June and August Cassone we carried news items about The Queen's Beasts, a set of re-imaginings of the heraldic animals made from recycled materials by sculptor Tom Hiscocks. We wanted to know more.

Frances Follin: How did you start as an artist? What was your training?

Tom Hiscocks: I have always drawn – ever since I was quite small, it was the only subject at school that I could do with any degree of proficiency. I got an A at O level and at A level, but I didn’t follow the artistic calling then as my competing passion was for horses. I went to work in horse racing after school – although I made more money painting people’s horses than riding them!

I returned to art seriously as a ‘mature’ student just over 3 years ago. I attended a three-month summer school at the Slade School of Art in London. That really inspired me and confirmed that exploring issues through art is where my interest lies.

Since then I have undertaken a three-year BA in Fine Art at the Cambridge Art School.

FF: How did the commission for the Queen’s Beasts come about?

TH: I was not commissioned to make my interpretation of the Queen’s Beasts, I was compelled to do it. I am interested in the ideas of identity and expression; how we are seen and how we are perceived (by ourselves as well as by others).

When I visited the replicas of the original beasts in Kew gardens, I was struck by their rigidity and solemnity. They had been created for a particularly formal occasion 60 years ago, but they had other sides to their character that I felt strongly they wanted to express. I think it resonated with my own feelings of having played a role dictated by my response to circumstance, rather than freely expressing myself – so I felt compelled to give these beasts an alternative expression.

FF: I believe the originals are now in Canada – did you visit them?

TH: The originals are in Canada, but replicas, made of Portland stone by the same original artist, are positioned in Kew Garden. It was these that I visited.

FF: For your sculptures do you work exclusively in recycled metal or do you use other recycled and/or virgin media?

TH: I make armatures from black steel rod, which is not necessarily recycled. The same is true of the galvanized steel wire mesh that I use to create the surfaces, but otherwise everything is reclaimed. I used about 2500 used drinks cans for the beasts, but I also sourced other materials from scrap yards – lead; a copper water boiler; some old bed springs; car bumpers and headlights and an old fire extinguisher.

I am interested in the intrinsic beauty of much of the material that gets thrown away, and I wanted to explore how this could be given a new form of life.

FF: Do you feel that artists can make a real difference to how people perceive ‘green’ issues?

TH: I think there a huge range of ideas and initiatives that create awareness of particular issues, and art, and artists have always played their role in this. The ‘green’ issue is very current, and I have been very struck by the very positive response that people of all ages have expressed in response to seeing the beasts.

FF: Is painting or sculpture the more important to you?

TH: That’s an interesting question. All forms of artistic expression are important, and each comes with different intrinsic characteristics. I am always fascinated to see how different artists use their materials to underpin the point they are making. In the case of the Queen’s Beasts, I felt that 3D was important, and I felt that reclaimed materials were important, so for this project sculpting seemed to be an appropriate form of expression.

I love painting but at this stage I think the issues I am looking at lend themselves to a sculptural response.

FF: Is any of your other work on public display? Where might people see it?

TH: I am fortunate that much of my work hangs in the homes of some special people, but there is no other work on public display at the moment. I hope that will change as I create more sculptural pieces.

FF: You have been keen to engage ordinary people directly with art. How did your ‘Instant art’ days come about and what do they entail? Are more planned soon?

TH: ‘Instant Art’ came from a conversation with people about their perception of having limited creative capability. I believe there is a creative streak in all of us, but like most things it has to be accessed and developed. ‘Instant Art’ is basically about playing with paint. I wanted to find a means for people to engage with paint without having to hear the voice in their head telling them they couldn’t do it.

What gets created is a direct reflection of the character of each participant. When you stop trying to re-produce something that is observable ‘out there’, your creation becomes a reflection of what’s inside. It’s an image of all the decisions you made in the process of creation, and this reflects much more of the sub-conscious. It is great what can happen when you stop your mind getting in the way!

FF: Thank you for talking to Cassone – do let us know when you have any exhibitions or other events.

 

 

Credits

Author:
Frances Follin
Location:
London
Role:
Independent art historian

Media credit: Courtesy Tom Hiscocks. Photograph by Greg Hider


Other interesting content

Subscribe to Cassone – it's free and it's fabulous